Chongqing Marriott Hotel
Luxury Chongqing hotel with indoor pool, connected to the convention center
- Free parking
Location
Great location
Pool
Great pool
Service
Fantastic service
Bar
Bar could improve
Chongqing Marriott Hotel
from NZ$135- Deluxe Room, 1 King Bed, City View
- Deluxe Room, River View
- Executive Room, Mountain View, Executive Level
- Executive Room, River View, Executive Level
- Deluxe Suite, 1 Bedroom, Business Lounge Access
- Deluxe Room, 1 King Bed, Mountain View
- Deluxe Room, 2 Double Beds, Mountain View
- Deluxe Room, 2 Double Beds, River View
- Executive Room, Mountain View, Executive Level
- Executive Room, River View, Executive Level
Didn’t find the right property?
Continue searching for Chongqing, ChinaRecent reviews
Superb 9.2 From 42 reviews
Exceptional
Good place to stay but no local attraction. Also far from city center. Bar is for name sake. No choice of drinks
UTPAL, in4 night business trip
Good
The hotel itself was nice but the service was very slow. The last time we stayed we really enjoyed the breakfast, which was the reason why we chose to stay again this time for our staycation but the breakfast was very disappointing. There was hardly anything there and choice was quite limited.
as1 night romance trip
Exceptional
fantastic service
us2 night trip
Exceptional
Beautiful well laid out room with a view, friendly
Friendly helpful service nice smelling new hotel, very comfortable stay
Sophia, us1 night family trip
Good
Nice hotel, Bad management
It was a nice hotel with very fancy facilities. I really like their food and views. However, their management was very bad in many aspects. Ex. I booked an executive room, but I hadn't been told any detail about the amenities which I could access during the checkin; A repairman broke into our room without knocking the door at 1am, because he thought it was a vacant room, etc. I cannot believe these happened in this kind of luxury hotel. So I only can rate three stars for them.
us2 night trip with friends
Is the description of this property not correct? Tell us
